為了減重,不少人嘗試過很多方法,像節食、運動、藥物等等。最近,名為「隔日禁食」的減肥方法在國外開始被採用。有研究指出,以這種方式限制熱量攝入,實際上可能對我們減重有好處。但另一個研究則指出,這個方法不會比普通的節食好,而且更難維持。
![In one of the longest and largest trials of alternate-day fasting, researchers studied 100 obese adults for over three years.](http://teepr.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/590feba01429a.png)
在其中一個最長和最大的「隔日禁食」試驗中,研究人員花費超過3年研究了100名肥胖的成年人。實驗對象被隨機地分成3組:第一組是沒有限制,第二組是每天減少25%的熱量攝取,第三組是隔日禁食 (在禁食當天攝取熱量需求的25%,在非禁食日攝取125%)。
![The participants were randomly split into different groups and given three different diets: no restrictions on food intake, reducing calorie intake every day by 25 percent, and alternate-day fasting, which involved consuming 25 percent of calorie needs on fast days, then 125 percent on the "feast" days.](http://teepr.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/590feba15431f.png)
一年後,採取隔日禁食的人平均減重6%,每天減少25%熱量攝取的人平均減重5.3%,兩組實驗對象的血壓和心率變化沒有太大差異。
![After a year, those participating in alternate-day fasting lost six percent of their body weight on average, while the daily calorie restriction group lost about 5.3 percent. Blood pressure and heart rate changes were not significantly different in the two groups either.](http://teepr.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/590feba20eff1.png)
但他們發現,38%採取隔日禁食的人退出了研究,而每天減少25%熱量攝取的人則有29%退出研究。研究人員也指出,很多隔日禁食的人因為對禁食當天吃很少、非禁食日卻可以吃很多而感到不滿,最後沒有遵從飲食限制。可以看來,雖然隔日禁食很有效,但並不是每個人都有足夠的毅力。
![They also found that the dropout rate for the alternate-day fasting group was 38 percent, while it was a much lower 29 percent for the daily calorie restriction group. The authors said that many participants in the former group also changed their diets due to dissatisfaction by eating more on fast days and slightly less on feast days.](http://teepr.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/590feba2a50c3.png)
來源:Viralnova
小編認為每個人都有適合自己的減肥方法,這個方法可能對你沒有效,但對其他人卻有效。把文章分享給想減肥的人看看,讓他們更了解這個方法的利弊吧!
(往下還有更多精彩文章!)